Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Biological Research For Nursing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holden, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Therrien, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holden, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Therrien, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Effect of Familiarity on Distraction and Single Cue Use after Hippocampal Damage

Janean Erickson Holden, PhD, RN

College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Barbara Therrien, PhD, RN, FAAN

College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Spatial disorientation frequently occurs in conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease that damage the hippocampus, a brain structure necessary for learning and memory. Use of a single cue to mark a submerged escape platform in the Morris water test can reduce spatial disorientation in rats. If the cue used is a familiar one, disoriented rats perform the wayfinding task as well as control animals. However, in a real-world environment, cues rarely occur alone. This study examined whether rats with bilateral hippocampal lesions familiar with a cue performed the Morris water test as well as controls and faster than lesioned rats unfamiliar with the cue when a distracter was present. Bilateral electrolytic lesions were made in male rats that had received either familiarity with a cue or handling only. Familiar lesioned rats were introduced to the distracter on test days 1 (FB1) or 3 (FB3), and unfamiliar lesioned rats on day 3 (UB3). No significant differences were found for FB1 or FB3 rats and their respective controls. FB1 rats increased mean swim times on day 1 compared to preoperative day 4 (16.44 ± 4.3 vs. 4.06 ± 2.1 s, respectively, p< 0.03) but quickly adapted to the distracter. FB3 rats were slower than FB1 rats on day 3 (6.81 ± 1.0 vs. 4.56 ± 0.3 s, respectively, p < 0.05). UB3 rats were impaired on the task compared to FB1 rats on days 3-7 (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that cue familiarity is effective in the presence of a distracter and that the response of disoriented rats to a distracter is influenced by the amount of prior experience with the cue.

Key Words: Cue • disorientation • wayfinding • hippocampus • distraction • familiarity

Biological Research For Nursing, Vol. 1, No. 3, 165-178 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/109980040000100302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
M. M. Heitkemper and E. F. Bond
State of Nursing Science: On the Edge
Biol Res Nurs, January 1, 2003; 4(3): 151 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]