This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Goodyear-Bruch, C. Articles by Pierce, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goodyear-Bruch, C. Articles by Pierce, J. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparison of a Visual to a Computer Assisted Technique for Detecting Apoptosis

School of Nursing, University of Kansas, School of Allied Health, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160-7504; phone: 913-588-3361; fax: 913-588-3334; cgoodyearbruch{at}kumc.edu

Kaycee Simon, BSN, SRNA, RN

School of Allied Health, University of Kansas, Kansas City.

Sandra Hall, PhD

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas, Kansas City.

Matthew S. Mayo, PhD

Medical Statistics and Research Design Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, and the director of Biostatistics/ Informatics, Kansas Cancer Institute, Kansas City.

Janet D. Pierce, DSN, CCRN, ARNP

School of Nursing, University of Kansas, Kansas City.

In many studies, fluorescent dyes (ethidium bromide [EB] and acridine orange [AO]) are used to stain DNA to determine if nuclei are apoptotic. However, there are numerous visual methods for counting these stained DNA that may lead to inaccuracies Measuring apoptosis by the visual counting method may be imprecise because of the variability of individuals’ perception of color. Therefore, the authors compared a visual method of counting chromatin for apoptosis with a method relying on a computer program. They began counting chromatin using the visual method, in which individuals identify the stained DNA using their own visual perception. For comparison, they used a software-based counting method (analySIS software) to determine the color (hue) of the stained DNA. Using the numeric hue values from the software eliminates the variations in human color perception. Intra and interrater reliability of the visual and computerassisted counting methods were evaluated with Spearman’s. The authors found statistical significance in the intrarater reliability (r = 1.0,P = 0.0001 for all chromatin categories) and interrater reliability (r = 0.975,P = 0.005 for both readings) when using the software program. No statistical significance was found for the visual counting method, indicating inaccuracy between and within raters. Thus, the computerassisted counting method of identifying the damaged DNA is more accurate and precise than the individual’s visual perception of color. Based on these data, apoptosis measurements using color staining with EB and AO should be determined using hue values generated by a computer program and not by a researcher’s visual assessment.

Key Words: apoptosis • ethidium bromide • acridine • orange • free radicals

Biological Research For Nursing, Vol. 6, No. 3, 180-186 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1099800404271869


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. J Mach, A. R Knight, J. A Orr, and J. D Pierce Apoptosis and haemorrhagic shock Journal of Research in Nursing, January 1, 2009; 14(1): 77 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Pierce, C. Goodyear-Bruch, S. Hall, and R. L. Clancy Effect of dopamine on rat diaphragm apoptosis and muscle performance Exp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 91(4): 731 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]