This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fisher, E. M. Articles by Baranek, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fisher, E. M. Articles by Baranek, R. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB CARBON DIOXIDE Medline Plus Health Information Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Comparison of Gastric and Rectal CO₂ in Cardiac Surgery Patients

The University of Akron, College of Nursing, Akron, OH 44325-3701; efisher{at}uakron.edu

Mary E. Kerr, RN, PhD

Leslie A. Hoffman, RN, PhD

University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA.

Richard P. Steiner, PhD, MPH

Department of Statistics at The University of Akron, Akron, OH.

Robert A. Baranek, MD

SUMMA Health Systems, Akron, OH.

Critical care nurses assess and treat clinical conditions associated with inadequate oxygenation. Changes in regional organ (gut) blood flow are believed to occur in response to a decrease in oxygenation. Although the stomach is a widely accepted monitoring site, there are multiple methodological and measurement issues associated with the gastric environment that limit the accuracy of P CO2 detection. The rectum may provide nurses with an alternative site for monitoring changes in PCO2 without the limitations associated with gastric monitoring. This pilot study used a repeated measures design to examine changes in gastric and rectal PCO2 during elective coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and in the immediate 4-hr postoperative period in 26 subjects. The systemic indicators explained little variation in the regional indicators during protocol. A comparison of rectal and gastric PCO2 revealed no statistically significant differences in the direction or magnitude of change over any phase of cardiac surgery (baseline, CPB, post-CPB). A reduction in both rectal and gastric PCO2 occurred during CPB, and both values trended upward during the post-CPB phase. However, poor correlation and agreement was found between the measures of PCO2 at the two sites. Although clinically important, the cause is unclear. Possible explanations include variation in CO2 production between the gastric and rectal site, differences in sensitivity of the two monitoring instruments, or the absence of hemodynamic complications, which limited the extent of change in PCO2. Further investigation using patients with more profound changes in oxygenation are needed to identify response patterns and possible mechanisms.

Key Words: tonometry • carbon dioxide/me[metabolic] • intestines/me[metabolic] • partial pressure • monitoring/physiologic • human

Biological Research For Nursing, Vol. 6, No. 4, 268-280 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1099800404274049


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?