Biological Research For Nursing

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, A. H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, A. H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, D. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Biological Research For Nursing, Vol. 9, No. 2, 170-178 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1099800407308083

Direct Sequencing Is More Accurate and Feasible in Detecting Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms than RFLP: Using Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene as a Model

Amy H. T. Davis, PhD, RN

Center for Injury Mechanisms and Related Responses, Gene Therapy Group, at the University of Arizona, Tucson, ahtdavis{at}nursing.arizona.edu

Jianhua Wang, MS

Center for Injury Mechanisms and Related Responses, Gene Therapy Group, at the University of Arizona, Tucson

Tom C. Tsang, PhD

Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Gene Therapy Group, at the University of Arizona, Tucson

David T. Harris, PhD

Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Gene Therapy Group, at the University of Arizona, Tucson

Since the sequencing of the human genome, there has been increased interest in understanding the distribution and effects of genetic variations among individuals. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) is a well-established and frequently used method for genotyping. This method, however, is indirect and has a number of limitations. It is thus important to reevaluate the use of RFLP in light of more contemporary methods of genotyping. The specific aims of this study are to (a) compare genotyping methods of traditional RFLP with contemporary direct sequencing for accurate identification of polymorphisms within the human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene and (b) describe distribution of a known single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the VEGF gene in a sample composed of 50 healthy volunteers. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify the initial sample of DNA. Genotypes of a G-to-A substitution (GG, AG, AA) at -1154 were analyzed by RFLP and direct sequencing. RFLP was unable to discriminate among the three possible genotypes, whereas direct sequencing clearly identified genotype for all 50 samples. Observed genotype frequencies were comparable with the Hardy-Weinberg principle. This comparative study provides justification for selecting direct sequencing instead of RFLP for detecting SNPs in selected genes.

Key Words: gene • single nucleotide polymorphism • vascular endothelial growth factor • restriction fragment length polymorphism • direct sequencing • methodology • accuracy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?