This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1099800408324612v1 1099800408324612v2 10/4/400    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fisher, E. M. Articles by Wineman, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fisher, E. M. Articles by Wineman, N. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Conceptualizing compensatory responses: Implications for treatment and research

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: efisher{at}uakron.edu.

	Abstract

Many scientists approach the discovery and application of knowledge of physiological processes from a reductionistic paradigm. A reductionistic approach focuses on treating one or a few key disease-related variables but overlooks the interaction of systems and their dependency on one another to produce homeostasis. The purposes of this article are to examine the current paradigm underlying treatment and its effect on patient outcome and to present an alternative perspective for understanding the body’s compensatory responses and their implications for treatment and research. Chaos theory and nonlinear methods are presented as possible ways to conceptualize and explore the complex integration of physiological patterns in response to disease, aging, and treatment.

First published on December 28, 2008, doi:10.1177/1099800408324612

Biological Research For Nursing 2009;10:400.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2009
This version was published on March 24, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?